Landed COGS

TL;DR

Landed COGS (Landed Cost of Goods Sold) is the total cost to deliver a unit of inventory to its destination — including manufacturing cost, freight, duties, customs, and inbound logistics. Landed COGS is typically 1.15–1.40× the manufacturer-quoted unit cost depending on origin and freight terms. For accurate <a href="/glossary/gross-margin" class="text-brand-600 underline decoration-brand-200 underline-offset-2 hover:text-brand-700">gross margin</a> calculation, landed COGS is the right input — using ex-factory unit cost overstates gross margin by 5–15 points.

What is landed COGS?

Landed COGS is the total cost of getting an inventory unit to its destination — typically the brand's warehouse — including manufacturing cost (the unit price quoted by the supplier), freight (sea/air), duties and tariffs, customs brokerage, insurance, and inbound logistics from port to warehouse.

It is contrast to ex-factory cost (the supplier's quoted price, picked up at the manufacturer's facility), which is the more commonly reported figure but a meaningfully understated cost basis. The gap between ex-factory and landed COGS is typically 15–40% depending on origin, freight terms, and tariff exposure.

How to calculate it

Landed COGS per unit =
  Manufacturer ex-factory unit cost
  + Freight cost per unit (apportioned across shipment)
  + Duties and tariffs per unit
  + Customs brokerage per unit
  + Insurance per unit
  + Port handling and inbound logistics per unit

Typical ratios (2024–25):
  China-origin to US warehouse: 1.18–1.35× ex-factory
  US-origin to US warehouse:    1.05–1.12× ex-factory
  EU-origin to US warehouse:    1.15–1.25× ex-factory
  India-origin to US warehouse: 1.20–1.30× ex-factory

Why landed COGS matters

Using ex-factory cost as COGS overstates gross margin by 5–15 percentage points depending on origin and freight terms. This understatement compounds throughout unit-economics calculations: overstated gross margin produces overstated contribution margin, overstated payback metrics, and overstated cash-conversion estimates.

Landed COGS is also the right basis for inventory-investment decisions. Working capital tied up in inventory is the landed amount, not the ex-factory amount. Operators planning inventory orders need landed-cost forecasts (which include freight rate volatility) rather than ex-factory quotes.

Common pitfalls

1. Using ex-factory cost as COGS in P&L reporting. Standard accounting treats freight and duties as separate line items, leaving 'COGS' as ex-factory only. For gross-margin analysis, use landed COGS — the standard P&L view systematically understates true cost basis.
2. Treating freight as a fixed per-unit allocation. Freight rates are volatile (the 2021–22 freight spike doubled landed costs for some categories). Re-estimate landed COGS quarterly, not annually.
3. Ignoring tariff exposure changes. Tariffs change frequently (China Section 301, EU AD/CV duties, etc.). Landed COGS calculations need to track current tariff rates per HTS code.

Gross margin should be calculated using landed COGS for accuracy. Fully-allocated cost extends landed COGS by adding allocated overhead. Inventory DOH works on landed-cost basis for working-capital math. Contribution margin should net all costs against landed-COGS-based gross profit.

At a glance

Category: Profit Intelligence
Related: 5 terms

Frequently asked questions

What's a typical landed COGS ratio?

China-to-US: 1.18–1.35× ex-factory. US domestic: 1.05–1.12×. EU-to-US: 1.15–1.25×. Heavily dependent on category, freight mode (sea vs air), and tariff exposure. Reassess quarterly during volatile freight periods.

Should you use landed COGS or ex-factory in P&L?

Standard accounting separates them — ex-factory in COGS, freight/duties in their own lines. For gross-margin analysis, combine into landed COGS. Without combining, gross margin is overstated by 5–15 points and downstream unit economics are overstated correspondingly.

How can you reduce landed COGS?

Three main levers: (1) freight terms — negotiate FOB vs CIF/DDP appropriately; (2) origin diversification — Vietnam/India alternatives to China for tariff exposure; (3) consolidation — combine smaller shipments to amortise freight better. Most operators have meaningful headroom on at least one of these.

Sources

Freightos freight rate data (2024–25)
USTR tariff schedules
Fairview customer data (D2C, 2025)

Fairview is an operating intelligence platform that computes landed COGS by joining manufacturer cost data with freight invoices, duties, and inbound logistics — making the gross-margin view rest on the cost basis that actually represents inventory dollars deployed. Start your free trial →

Siddharth Gangal is the founder of Fairview. He built the landed-COGS layer after watching D2C brands report 'gross margin 62%' to investors when the actual landed-COGS gross margin was 51% — the 11-point gap was freight, duties, and inbound logistics that flowed through different P&L lines, never aggregated into the headline margin number.

See it in Fairview

Track Landed COGS automatically.

14-day free trial. No credit card. First data source connected in 5 minutes.

Start free trial Book a demo