Core Intelligence
Operating Dashboard
Real-time view of revenue, margin, and pipeline
Margin Intelligence
Know which channels and SKUs make money
Forecast Confidence Engine
Revenue forecasts you can actually trust
Advanced Analytics
Blended ROAS Dashboard
True return on ad spend across every channel
Cohort LTV Tracker
Lifetime value by acquisition cohort and channel
SKU Profitability
Profit and loss at the individual product level
More Features
Pipeline Health Monitor
Spot deal risks before they hit revenue
Weekly Operating Report
Auto-generated briefs for your Monday review
All 14 features
Featured
Data Connection Layer
Connect HubSpot, Stripe, Shopify and 10+ tools in minutes. No code, no CSV uploads.
Learn moreCRM
HubSpot
Sync CRM deals, contacts, and pipeline data
Salesforce
Pull opportunities, accounts, and forecasts
Pipedrive
Connect deals and activity data
Finance & Commerce
Stripe
Revenue, subscriptions, and payment data
Shopify
Orders, products, and store analytics
QuickBooks
P&L, expenses, and accounting data
Marketing
Google Ads
Campaign spend, clicks, and conversions
Meta Ads
Facebook and Instagram ad performance
All 14 integrations
5-minute setup
Connect your first data source
OAuth login, select metrics, and start seeing unified data. No CSV uploads or developer time.
See all integrationsIndustries
eCommerce
Unified margins, ROAS, and LTV for online stores
D2C Brands
True contribution margin across every channel
B2B SaaS
Pipeline-to-revenue visibility for operators
Use Cases
Find Profit Leaks
Spot hidden costs eating your margins
Weekly Operating Review
Run your Monday review in 15 minutes
Replace Manual Reporting
Eliminate 4-6 hours of spreadsheet work
More
True ROAS
Blended return on ad spend across all channels
Revenue Forecast
Data-backed forecasts your board trusts
All industries & use cases
Popular use case
Find Profit Leaks
Most operators discover 8-15% of revenue leaking through hidden costs within the first week.
See how it worksLearn
Blog
Operating insights for founders and COOs
Glossary
Key terms in operating intelligence
What is Operating Intelligence?
The category explained in plain English
Use Cases
Weekly Operating Review
Run your Monday review in 15 minutes
Replace Manual Reporting
Eliminate 4-6 hours of spreadsheet work
Margin Visibility
Know which channels and SKUs make money
New on the blog
How to run a Weekly Operating Review without 3 hours of prep
The exact process operators use to arrive briefed — without touching a spreadsheet.
Read the postProfit Intelligence
Overhead allocation (also called indirect cost allocation or overhead apportionment) is the method of distributing shared business expenses across the revenue-generating units of a company. These shared expenses — rent, insurance, executive salaries, IT infrastructure, finance team costs — don't belong to any single product or department. Allocation assigns them proportionally so operators can calculate true unit economics.
Without overhead allocation, profitability analysis stops at gross margin. You know how much it costs to produce a product, but not how much of the office lease, the finance team's salary, or the ERP subscription that product should carry. Two product lines with identical gross margins can have wildly different true profitability once overhead is distributed.
For mid-market B2B companies ($5M-$30M revenue), overhead typically represents 15-30% of total revenue. Companies on the lower end have lean support functions. Companies on the higher end often carry overhead from an earlier growth phase that no one has restructured. The right allocation method reveals which lines are subsidizing others.
Overhead allocation is distinct from COGS attribution. COGS covers direct costs tied to producing or delivering the product. Overhead covers everything else that keeps the business running but cannot be traced directly to a single unit of output.
Most operators track gross margin and call it profitability. That misses 15-30% of total costs. A product line showing 68% gross margin may show 31% margin after overhead — or 52%, depending on how much support it actually consumes. You cannot make rational investment decisions without this number.
The cost of ignoring allocation shows up in portfolio decisions. Companies routinely invest in product lines that appear profitable at the gross margin level but destroy value once allocated costs are included. A typical 80-person SaaS company carrying $1.8M in annual overhead discovers that their secondary product line — seemingly profitable at 55% gross margin — drops to 8% margin after allocation because it consumes a disproportionate share of support and engineering resources.
Overhead allocation also prevents political budget fights. When every department agrees on the allocation methodology upfront, quarterly cost reviews become data conversations instead of blame sessions.
Overhead Rate = Total Overhead Costs / Allocation Base
Cost Allocated to Unit = Overhead Rate x Unit's Share of Base
Example (revenue-based allocation):
- Total overhead: $1,740,000 / year
- Total company revenue: $12,200,000
- Overhead rate: $1,740,000 / $12,200,000 = 14.3%
Product A revenue: $7,800,000
Product A allocated overhead: $7,800,000 x 14.3% = $1,115,400
Product B revenue: $4,400,000
Product B allocated overhead: $4,400,000 x 14.3% = $629,200
Common allocation bases:
How overhead as a percentage of revenue varies across B2B segments. Lower is not always better — underinvestment in support functions creates hidden costs.
| Company Type | Overhead / Revenue (Good) | Average | Above Average | Action if high |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Early SaaS ($1-5M ARR) | 18-24% | 25-32% | 33%+ | Audit tool stack and admin headcount |
| Growth SaaS ($5-20M ARR) | 14-20% | 21-27% | 28%+ | Restructure G&A; consolidate tools |
| B2B Services / Agencies | 20-28% | 29-35% | 36%+ | Review office footprint and admin ratios |
| E-commerce with B2B channel | 12-18% | 19-25% | 26%+ | Separate warehouse overhead from corporate |
Sources: SaaStr 2025 Benchmark Report (SaaS segments), Pavilion COO Survey 2025, industry-observed ranges based on operator reports.
1. Using a single allocation base for everything
Revenue-based allocation is popular because it is simple. But it distorts results when products consume overhead differently. A low-revenue enterprise product that requires 40% of your support team's time gets undercharged. Use multiple bases — headcount for people-related overhead, revenue for sales-related, square footage for facilities.
2. Allocating overhead annually instead of quarterly
Companies calculate overhead rates once a year and apply them for 12 months. Costs shift. A Q1 rate applied in Q4 after two new hires and an office expansion produces meaningless numbers. Recalculate quarterly at minimum.
3. Including one-time costs in recurring overhead
A $200K office buildout or a $150K legal settlement should not be spread across product margins for the next 12 months. Separate non-recurring items from the overhead pool. Otherwise every product looks artificially unprofitable in the year of a large one-time expense.
4. Treating all departments equally
Some departments serve specific products disproportionately. If 70% of your customer success team supports Product A, allocating their cost equally across three products understates Product A's true cost and overstates the others.
Fairview's Margin Intelligence connects to your accounting platform (QuickBooks, Xero) and categorizes expenses as direct or overhead automatically based on your chart of accounts. You choose the allocation base — revenue, headcount, or custom — and Fairview distributes overhead to each product line, channel, or department.
The Operating Dashboard displays post-allocation margin alongside gross margin and contribution margin. When overhead as a percentage of revenue rises above your threshold, the Next-Best Action Engine flags it: "Overhead ratio increased from 19% to 24% QoQ. G&A grew 31% while revenue grew 8%. Review administrative headcount."
→ See how Margin Intelligence works
| Overhead Allocation | Direct Cost Allocation | |
|---|---|---|
| What it distributes | Indirect costs (rent, admin, IT, insurance) | Direct costs (COGS, materials, direct labor) |
| Traceability | Cannot be traced to a single product | Directly traceable to a specific product or service |
| Requires judgment | Yes — choice of allocation base affects results | No — costs are assigned to the product that incurred them |
| Accuracy risk | High — wrong base distorts profitability | Low — costs are observable and verifiable |
Direct cost allocation is objective: you can see which product consumed the materials. Overhead allocation requires a method, and the method shapes the answer. That is why the choice of allocation base matters more than the math.
Overhead allocation takes the shared costs of running a business — rent, utilities, software, administrative salaries — and divides them across your products or departments. It answers: "How much of our overhead should each product line carry?" Without it, you only see gross margin. With it, you see whether a product actually makes money after its share of the whole operation.
For growth-stage SaaS ($5-20M ARR), overhead between 14-20% of revenue is considered well-managed. Above 28% signals bloated G&A or an office footprint that has outgrown the team. Early-stage companies run higher (18-32%) because fixed costs are spread across a smaller revenue base.
Divide total overhead costs by the chosen allocation base. If total overhead is $1.74M and total revenue is $12.2M, the rate is 14.3%. Apply that rate to each unit. Product A with $7.8M revenue carries $1.12M in allocated overhead. Recalculate quarterly as costs and revenue shift.
Overhead allocation uses a single rate applied uniformly (e.g., 14% of revenue). Activity-based costing (ABC) traces each overhead category to the specific activities that cause it — then allocates based on actual consumption. ABC is more accurate but requires more data. Most B2B companies under $30M use simple allocation; larger companies benefit from ABC.
Quarterly at minimum. Annual reviews miss mid-year cost changes — new hires, tool additions, office expansions. Companies that reallocate quarterly catch margin drift 3 months earlier than those using annual rates. Update the allocation base whenever the business adds a material new cost center.
Overhead includes any cost that cannot be directly traced to producing a specific product: rent, utilities, insurance, administrative salaries, accounting software, legal fees, office supplies, and IT infrastructure. It does not include COGS (direct materials, hosting, direct labor) or sales commissions tied to specific deals.
Fairview is an operating intelligence platform that tracks overhead allocation alongside gross margin, contribution margin, and EBITDA. Start your free trial →
Siddharth Gangal is the founder of Fairview. He built automated overhead tracking into the platform after watching operators argue over cost allocation in spreadsheets — each department producing a different version of "true" profitability.
Ready to see your data clearly?
10 minutes to connect. No SQL. No engineering team. Your first dashboard is built automatically.
No credit card required · Cancel anytime · Setup in under 10 minutes